<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><!-- generator="b2evolution/7.2.5-stable" -->
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Mark Cassino Photography - Latest Comments on Snowcapes!</title>
		<link>https://www.markcassino.com/b2evolution/index.php/home/?disp=comments</link>
		<atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://www.markcassino.com/b2evolution/index.php?blog=2&#38;tempskin=_rss2&#38;disp=comments&#38;p=164" />
		<description></description>
		<language>en-US</language>
		<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
		<admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://b2evolution.net/?v=7.2.5-stable"/>
		<ttl>60</ttl>
		<item>
			<title>mcc [Member] in response to: Snowcapes!</title>
			<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2007 02:36:56 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator><span class="login user nowrap" rel="bubbletip_user_1"><span class="identity_link_username">mcc</span></span> <span class="bUser-member-tag">[Member]</span></dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">c458@https://www.markcassino.com/b2evolution/</guid>
			<description>&lt;p&gt;I upgraded to the Pentax DA 14-45, f4 zoom. It&amp;#8217;s sharper than the 18-55, particularly wide open and in the corner of the frames. Unlike the 18-55, there is virtually no light falloff in the corners of the frame. The zoom range is very useful - wider at the wide end, but not quite as long. It still has some very slight chromatic aberration under some circumstances - but not enough to be a problem. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;With regards to the macro lens - I very recently purchased a DA 100 f2.8 macro. This is an excellent optic! Small, lightweight, excellent image quality. I&amp;#8217;d highly recommend it.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;HTH - MCC&lt;/p&gt;</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I upgraded to the Pentax DA 14-45, f4 zoom. It&#8217;s sharper than the 18-55, particularly wide open and in the corner of the frames. Unlike the 18-55, there is virtually no light falloff in the corners of the frame. The zoom range is very useful - wider at the wide end, but not quite as long. It still has some very slight chromatic aberration under some circumstances - but not enough to be a problem. </p>

<p>With regards to the macro lens - I very recently purchased a DA 100 f2.8 macro. This is an excellent optic! Small, lightweight, excellent image quality. I&#8217;d highly recommend it.</p>

<p>HTH - MCC</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<link>https://www.markcassino.com/b2evolution/index.php/snowcapes?blog=2#c458</link>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title> Jackie [Visitor] in response to: Snowcapes!</title>
			<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 21:33:09 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator><span class="user anonymous" rel="bubbletip_comment_457">Jackie</span> <span class="bUser-anonymous-tag">[Visitor]</span></dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">c457@https://www.markcassino.com/b2evolution/</guid>
			<description>&lt;p&gt;Got a K10D for my birthday. Came with a 18-45mm lens which I don&amp;#8217;t really like. What lens do you recommend for general use? Also which for macro?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Got a K10D for my birthday. Came with a 18-45mm lens which I don&#8217;t really like. What lens do you recommend for general use? Also which for macro?</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<link>https://www.markcassino.com/b2evolution/index.php/snowcapes?blog=2#c457</link>
		</item>
			</channel>
</rss>
